The functional role of class II-associated invariant chain peptide (CLIP) in its ability to variably modulate immune responses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the process of class II MHC assembly and cell surface expression, the class II-associated invariant chain peptide (CLIP) is removed from the peptide-binding groove of MHC, a task mediated by H-2M. This allows binding and presentation of peptide epitopes. We have previously shown that exogenously added CLIP interferes with this process and down-regulates the cell surface expression of class II molecules. In this study, we explored the effect of exogenously added CLIP on antigen-specific immune responses. In vivo studies with CLIP and various peptide and protein antigens with different affinities for I-A(d) molecules demonstrated that CLIP variably affects the T cell-mediated immune responses. Immunization with CLIP along with the antigen induced a shift from a T(h)1- to T(h)2-like response as determined by the cytokine profile and antibody isotype. These results suggest that the presence of exogenous CLIP can significantly influence the presentation of antigen by class II MHC molecules to CD4 T cells and thereby modulate immune responses. Exogenously added CLIP rapidly localized into the subcellular compartment of antigen-presenting cells where MHC class II molecules are present. We suggest that exogenous CLIP reduces the loading of peptides on the class II molecules, thus down-regulating MHC-peptide complexes on the cell surface. Alternatively, CLIP may bind to cell surface class II molecules and this complex is rapidly internalized resulting in reduced cell surface MHC class II expression. The reduced level of MHC-peptide complexes favors the activation of T(h)2 cells over T(h)1 cells. These results have implications in the regulation of immune responses, particularly the prevention of certain autoimmune diseases where T(h)1-type responses are pathogenic and T(h)2-type responses are protective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".