Self and Place: Journeys in the Land
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One's sense of place relates closely to one's sense of self—a self inextricably linked and emergent within one's context. Contemporary lifestyles have altered human-to-environment relationships, including significant reductions in direct contact with wild nature, displacement of people from place, and shifts in our social and psychological well-being. These changes have diminished our sense of place and subsequently draw into question the strength and quality of our sense of self, especially in relationship to the natural world. The practice of “journeying” will be shared as an approach to facilitate personal growth, a reconnection to nature, and to evoke deeper meaning-making in change processes. Raffan's (1993) identification of the “types of knowledge invoked by the land” clarifies the role of therapeutic and educational processes designed to address this divergence. An Australian bush adventure therapy program case study illustrates the typologies of place knowledge, and examples of journeying across learning and therapeutic domains are provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it