MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136111016 · doi:10.1039/b418073a

Theoretical evidence for the formation of rotational energy level clusters in the vibrational ground state of PH3

2005· article· en· W2136111016 on OpenAlexaff
S. N. Yurchenko, Walter Thiel, Serguei Patchkovskii, Per Jensen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Commission
KeywordsExcited stateRotational partition functionRotational energyGround stateWave functionPotential energy surfaceCluster (spacecraft)Coupled clusterExcitationAtomic physicsQuantumEnergy (signal processing)Rotational temperaturePotential energyRotational symmetryPhysicsChemistryRotational–vibrational spectroscopyMoleculeQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate theoretically the rotational dynamics of pyramidal XY3 molecules in highly excited rotational states. Towards this end we compute, by a variational method, the rotational energy levels in the vibrational ground state of PH3 for J < or = 80. At J > or = 50 the calculated energy levels show a distinct cluster pattern. By monitoring the cluster formation we follow the various stages of the rotational dynamics. We analyze the wavefunctions for the cluster states and compute expectation values which show that the C3v geometrical symmetry of PH3 is broken at high rotational excitation. The conclusions drawn from the quantum-mechanical calculations are confirmed by semi-classical theory, i.e., by an analysis of the stationary points on the rotational energy surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207