Cofilin is a marker of myofibroblast differentiation in cells from porcine aortic cardiac valves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The formation of myofibroblasts in valve interstitial cell (VIC) populations contributes to fibrotic valvular disease. We examined myofibroblast differentiation in VICs from porcine aortic valves. In normal valves, cells immunostained for alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA, a myofibroblast marker) were rare (0.69 +/- 0.48%), but in sclerotic valves of animals fed an atherogenic diet, myofibroblasts were spatially clustered and abundant (31.2 +/- 6.3%). In cultured VIC populations from normal valves, SMA-positive myofibroblasts were also spatially clustered, abundant (21% positive cells after 1 passage), and stained for collagen type I and vimentin but not desmin. For an analysis of stem cells, two-color flow cytometry of isolated cells stained with Hoechst 33342 demonstrated that 0.5% of VICs were side population cells; none stained for SMA. Upon culture, sorted side population cells generated approximately 85% SMA-positive cells, indicating that some myofibroblasts originate from a rare population with stem cell characteristics. Plating cells on rigid collagen substrates enabled the formation of myofibroblasts after 5 days in culture, which was completely blocked by culture of cells on compliant collagen substrates. Exogenous tensile force also significantly increased SMA expression in VICs. Isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry were used to identify differentially expressed proteins in myofibroblast differentiation of VICs. Of the nine proteins that were identified, cofilin expression and phospho-cofilin were strongly increased by conditions favoring myofibroblast differentiation. Knockdown of cofilin with small-interfering RNA inhibited collagen gel contraction and reduced myofibroblast differentiation as assessed by the SMA incorporation into stress fibers. When compared with normal valves, diseased valves showed strong immunostaining for cofilin that colocalized with SMA in clustered cells. We conclude that in VICs, cofilin is a marker for myofibroblasts in vivo and in vitro that arise from a rare population of stem cells and require a rigid matrix for formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".