MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136119829

On the Complexity of Point Recolouring in Geometric Graphs

2008· article· en· W2136119829 on OpenAlexaff
Henk Meijer, Yurai Núñez Rodríguez, David Rappaport

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsSequence (biology)Binary numberPoint (geometry)Planar graphPlanarGraphRange (aeronautics)AlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsComputer scienceGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a collection of points representing geographic data we consider the task of delineating boundaries based on the features of the points. Assuming that the features are binary, for example, red or blue, this can be viewed as determining red and blue regions, or states. Due to regional anomalies or sampling error, we may find that reclassifying, or recolouring, some points may lead to a more rational delineation of boundaries. In this note we study the maximal length of recolouring sequences where recolouring rules are based on neighbour relations and neighbours are defined by a geometric graph. We show that the difference in the maximal length of recolouring sequences is striking, as it can range from a linear bound for all trees, to an infinite sequence for some planar graphs. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207