MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mulheres de cera, argila e arumã: princípios criativos e fabricação material entre os Wayana

2009· article· pt· W2136128327 on OpenAlex
Lúcia Hussak van Velthem

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMana · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Os índios Wayana, que vivem às margens do rio Paru de Leste, norte do estado do Pará, concebem que a fabricação de pessoas, casas, artefatos, padrões e muitas outras coisas está estreitamente relacionada aos demiurgos, porque eles as criaram nos tempos primordiais segundo uma tecnologia própria. Como enfatizam, os Wayana julgam-se apenas os "experimentadores" desses princípios criativos. Eles os empregam na elaboração de artefatos para uso cotidiano ou ritual, categorias estas que possuem características diferenciadas, resultado do poder generativo da tecnologia demiúrgica, mas que precisam ser controladas através das habilidades humanas. O artigo descreve os princípios criativos e de fabricação material em sua conectividade com as narrativas míticas e a cosmologia, detalhando os mecanismos das experiências realizadas pelos Wayana na produção e na utilização de obras belas e eficazes, objetivo de toda e qualquer criação.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it