Mulheres de cera, argila e arumã: princípios criativos e fabricação material entre os Wayana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Os índios Wayana, que vivem às margens do rio Paru de Leste, norte do estado do Pará, concebem que a fabricação de pessoas, casas, artefatos, padrões e muitas outras coisas está estreitamente relacionada aos demiurgos, porque eles as criaram nos tempos primordiais segundo uma tecnologia própria. Como enfatizam, os Wayana julgam-se apenas os "experimentadores" desses princípios criativos. Eles os empregam na elaboração de artefatos para uso cotidiano ou ritual, categorias estas que possuem características diferenciadas, resultado do poder generativo da tecnologia demiúrgica, mas que precisam ser controladas através das habilidades humanas. O artigo descreve os princípios criativos e de fabricação material em sua conectividade com as narrativas míticas e a cosmologia, detalhando os mecanismos das experiências realizadas pelos Wayana na produção e na utilização de obras belas e eficazes, objetivo de toda e qualquer criação.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".