MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136148224 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2004.88.10.1163c

First Report of Canola Powdery Mildew Caused by <i>Erysiphe polygoni</i> in Argentina

2004· article· en· W2136148224 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Gaetán, M. Madia

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPowdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPowdery mildewConidiumCanolaBiologyCultivarMyceliumHorticultureGerminationCropRapeseedBotanyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canola (Brassica napus) is a developing oleaginous crop grown commercially in the Buenos Aires and Santa Fe provinces of Argentina. During the autumn of 2003, typical signs of powdery mildew were observed on canola plants in experimental field plots in Buenos Aires. Average disease incidence was 42% on 3- to 6-month-old canola cultivars developed in the following countries: Argentina (Eclipse, Impulse Master, Mistral, and Nolza); Australia (Oscar and Rainbow); Canada (Sentry); France (Cadillac, Camberra, and Capitol); and Sweden (Maskot, Sponsor, and Wildcat). The range of incidence on these cultivars was 35 to 93%. Other cultivars exhibited an apparent high level of resistance or escaped disease. These included: Charlton (Argentina); 46CO3, Dunkeld, Insignia, Mystic, Monty, Outback, Rivette, and Surpass 400 (Australia), and Caviar (France). Climatic conditions in Buenos Aires, especially rainfall, from March to May 2003 were apparently favorable for powdery mildew development. On susceptible cultivars, fungal growth was observed on leaves, stems, and pods that resulted in premature senescence of the tissues. The mycelium, with multilobed hausthoria, was white to gray, dense or fine, and in patches or covering the entire adaxial leaf surfaces. Appressoria were lobed and conidiophores were straight. Foot cells were cylindrical, straight, measured 35 to 42 × 7 to 10 μm, and were followed by two cells. Conidia were produced singly, cylindrical to ovoid, and measured 36 to 40 × 18 to 20 μm. The conidial length-to-width ratio was 2.0. No fibrosin bodies were observed in the conidia and conidia germinated at the ends. Cleistothecia were not observed. On the basis of mycelial, conidial, and hausthoria characteristics observed on six leaves for each affected cultivar, the fungus was identified as Erysiphe polygoni DC (1). Pathogenicity was confirmed on 5-week-old canola plants of cvs. Eclipse, Impulse, Master, Mistral, and Maskot by gently pressing (1 min) one adaxial infected leaf with abundant sporulation onto one adaxial healthy leaf. The experiment, which included five inoculated plants and three noninoculated control plants for each cultivar, was conducted in a greenhouse at 22 to 24°C and maintained at 75% relative humidity with no supplemental light. Inoculated and control plants were covered with polyethylene bags for 48 h after inoculation. Powdery mildew developed on all inoculated plants of all cultivars after 12 to14 days. The control plants did not develop disease. The experiment was repeated with similar results. E. polygoni has a worldwide distribution (2); however, the results suggest that this fungus may be a threat to the main cultivars being grown in Argentina (Eclipse, Impulse, Master, Mistral, and Nolza), since high levels of disease incidence, as much as 70%, were observed. Under propitious environments, this pathogen could cause severe yield losses in commercially grown canola in Argentina. To our knowledge, this is the first report of canola powdery mildew caused by E. polygoni in Argentina. References: (1) H. J. Boesewinkel. Rev. Mycol. Tome 41:493, 1977. (2) D. F. Farr et al. Fungi on Plants and Plant Products in the United States. The American Phytopathological Society, St.Paul, MN, 1989.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPowdery Mildew Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207