MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136160929 · doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2111

Bicarbonate transport and extracellular carbonic anhydrase activity in Bering Sea phytoplankton assemblages: Results from isotope disequilibrium experiments

2006· article· en· W2136160929 on OpenAlexaff
Cheryl L. Martin, Philippe D. Tortell

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplanktonOceanographyExtracellularStable isotope ratioBicarbonateCarbonic anhydraseEnvironmental chemistryChemistryBiomass (ecology)Environmental scienceEcologyBiologyNutrientGeologyBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We used a 14C isotope disequilibrium technique to provide quantitative estimates of both direct HCO3- transport and extracellular CA activity in Bering Sea phytoplankton assemblages. The method revealed that direct HCO3- transport was the dominant mechanism of inorganic C uptake in both coastal and open ocean waters, accounting for more than half of the total C flux to the phytoplankton. The relative importance of HCO3- transport was not related to phytoplankton biomass, productivity, or ambient CO2 concentrations at individual sampling stations. However, HCO3- transport and total inorganic C uptake rates decreased in response to elevated CO2 in direct manipulation experiments. Kinetic analysis of the 14C time-course data revealed low levels of extracellular carbonic anhydrase activity at most stations. This activity was related to phytoplankton taxonomic compositions and/or CO2 concentrations, but was relatively unaffected by direct CO2 manipulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and OceanographySame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207