MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136164077 · doi:10.3386/w11301

Why Does Capital Flow to Rich States?

2005· preprint· en· W2136164077 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ṣebnem Kalemli‐Özcan, Ariell Reshef, Bent E. Sørensen, Oved Yosha

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research · 2005
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic theories and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirectorate-General for Economic and Financial AffairsUniversità BocconiYork UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaRice UniversityNorth Carolina State UniversityUniversity of OregonUniversity of Missouri
KeywordsFlow (mathematics)Capital (architecture)Capital flowsEconomicsBusinessMechanicsPhysicsMicroeconomicsArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnitude and the direction of net international capital flows does not fit neo-¸ classical models.The 50 U.S. states comprise an integrated capital market with very¸ low barriers to capital flows, which makes them an ideal testing ground for neoclassical¸ models.We develop a simple frictionless open economy model with perfectly diversified¸ ownership of capital and find that capital flows between the U.S. states are consistent¸ with the model.Therefore, the small size and "wrong" direction of net international¸ capital flows are likely due to frictions associated with national borders and not due¸ to inherent flaws in the neoclassical model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Bureau of Economic ResearchSame topicEconomic theories and modelsFrench-language works237,207