MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136168913 · doi:10.1109/cmpsac.1978.810401

An effective "on-line" deadlock detection technique for distributed data base management systems

2005· article· en· W2136168913 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeadlock prevention algorithmsDeadlockComputer scienceDistributed computingConcurrency controlWait-for graphResource allocationGraphProcess (computing)Theoretical computer scienceComputer networkDatabaseGraph rewritingProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A graph-theoretic model is used to represent the process interactions in DDBMS. From this model a general deadlock detection algorithm is derived, with the important feature of significantly reducing the communication requirements that usually follow the invocation of a deadlock detection mechanism. The idea of "on-line" detection of deadlocks in DDBMS is introduced, and an effective algorithm is presented which detects deadlocks without further delay, at the time of making the data resource allocation decision at the concerned installation. Problems and drawbacks involved in earlier attempts to handle deadlocks in distributed DBMS are provided. Several highlights of our proposals are emphasized, and further possibilities of research are identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207