MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136229527 · doi:10.3233/jae-2008-922

Pulsed eddy current thickness measurement of conductive layers over ferromagnetic substrates

2008· article· en· W2136229527 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaDepartment of National Defence
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical conductorMaterials scienceFerromagnetismEddy currentLift (data mining)ConductorConductivityComposite materialSubstrate (aquarium)Eddy-current testingElectrical resistivity and conductivityOptoelectronicsCondensed matter physicsElectrical engineeringChemistryPhysicsEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of this study is the behaviour of the lift-off point of intersection (LOI) under various test conditions: lift-off, thickness and conductivity of metallic layers with and without a ferromagnetic substrate. The pulsed eddy current (PEC) signal response is analyzed and a lift-off independent method to measure the thickness of conductive layers over ferromagnetic substrates is presented. This approach is tested by scanning specimens with varying lift-off and conductive layer thickness. The test articles have different substrate permeabilities, but identical lift-off and conductive layer conditions. The results demonstrate that the LOI feature can be used to measure the thickness of conductive layers over ferromagnetic substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it