MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136247706 · doi:10.1128/jvi.01998-09

Vaccinia Virus Particles Mix Inefficiently, and in a Way That Would Restrict Viral Recombination, in Coinfected Cells

2009· article· en· W2136247706 on OpenAlexafffund
Yi-Chan Lin, David H. Evans

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Virology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPoxvirus research and outbreaks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsVacciniaBiologyVirusVirologyGreen fluorescent proteinRecombinant DNAGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well established that poxviruses are subjected to genetic recombination, but attempts to map vaccinia virus genes using classical genetic crosses were historically confounded by high levels of experimental noise and a poor correlation between physical and genetic map distances. These virus-by-virus crosses also never produced the 50% recombinant progeny that should be seen in experiments involving distant markers. Poxviruses replicate in membrane-wrapped cytoplasmic structures called virosomes (or factories) and we have developed a method for tracking the development of these structures using live cell imaging and cells expressing phage lambda Cro protein fused to enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). The EGFP-cro protein binds nonspecifically to DNA and permits live cell imaging of developing vaccinia virus factories. Using this method, we see virosomes first appearing about 4 to 5 h postinfection. The early virosomes exhibit a compact appearance and then, after a period of exponential growth lasting several hours, blur and start to dissipate in a process presumably linked to viral packaging. During the growth period, the virosomes migrate toward the nuclear periphery while colliding and fusing at a rate dependent upon the numbers of infecting particles. However, even at high multiplicities of infection (10 PFU/cell), we estimate approximately 20% of the virosomes never fuse. We have also used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods to study virosomes formed by the fusion of viruses carrying different gene markers. FISH showed that DNA mixes rather poorly within fused virosomes and the amount of mixing is inversely dependent on the time between virosome appearance and fusion. Our studies suggest that the intracellular movement and mixing of virosomes create constraints that reduce opportunities for forming recombinants and that these phenomena create outcomes reflected in classical poxvirus genetics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VirologySame topicPoxvirus research and outbreaksFrench-language works237,207