MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136257660 · doi:10.1002/mop.20326

Series‐coupled microring resonator filters with embedded semiconductor optical amplifiers

2004· article· en· W2136257660 on OpenAlex
Otto Schwelb, I. Frigyes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorPort (circuit theory)MicrowaveOptical amplifierOptoelectronicsReturn lossSemiconductorClassification of discontinuitiesWaveguideMaterials scienceInsertion lossFabricationSensitivity (control systems)OpticsElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsLaserMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Back reflections from series‐coupled optical microring resonator filters caused by waveguide discontinuities are numerically investigated and optimized. The focus is on small discontinuities, such as those that can be expected from GaInAsP/InP‐based semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) embedded in ring resonators. Significant improvement of the return loss is obtained when the length of the SOA is appropriately chosen. The design principle is applied to both all‐pass (two‐port) and add/drop (four‐port) filters. The sensitivity of the design to fabrication parameters is discussed. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 42: 427–432, 2004; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.20326

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it