Probabilistic slow feature analysis‐based representation learning from massive process data for soft sensor modeling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Latent variable (LV) models provide explicit representations of underlying driving forces of process variations and retain the dominant information of process data. In this study, slow features (SFs) as temporally correlated LVs are derived using probabilistic SF analysis. SFs evolving in a state‐space form effectively represent nominal variations of processes, some of which are potentially correlated to quality variables and hence help improving the prediction performance of soft sensors. An efficient expectation maximum algorithm is proposed to estimate parameters of the probabilistic model, which turns out to be suitable for analyzing massive process data. Two criteria are also proposed to select quality‐relevant SFs. The validity and advantages of the proposed method are demonstrated via two case studies. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 61: 4126–4139, 2015
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it