Compressed Sensing Maximum Likelihood Channel Estimation for Ultra-Wideband Impulse Radio
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most attractive features of ultra-wideband impulse radio is the collection of rich multipath with the transmission of ultra-short pulses. Exploiting the rich multipath diversity with channel estimating Rake receivers enables significant energy capture, higher performance and flexibility than suboptimal receivers. Although data-aided (DA) maximum likelihood (ML) channel estimator shows a promising performance, its implementation is restricted by the Nyquist sampling criterion. The emerging theory of compressed sensing (CS) describes a novel framework to jointly compress and detect a sparse signal with fewer samples than the traditional Nyquist criterion. In this paper, we propose a CS-ML channel estimator which combines the compression framework of CS for sampling rate reduction while retaining the noise statistics formulation of ML to achieve a reliable performance. Simulation assessment indicates that, with far fewer measurements, the performance of our proposed scheme supersedes that of the 4-norm minimization estimator of CS and can be as close as the ML, but with a reduction in complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it