MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136310247 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117811

The<i>Herschel</i>view of the on-going star formation in the Vela-C molecular cloud

2012· article· en· W2136310247 on OpenAlexaff
T. Giannini, D. Elia, D. Lorenzetti, S. Molinari, F. Motte, E. Schisano, S. Pezzuto, M. Pestalozzi, A. M. Di Giorgio, P. André, T. Hill, M. Benedettini, S. Bontemps, James Di Francesco, C. Fallscheer, M. Hennemann, J. M. Kirk, V. Minier, Q. Nguyễn Lương, D. Polychroni, K. L. J. Rygl, P. Saraceno, N. Schneider, L. Spinoglio, L. Testi, D. Ward–Thompson, G. J. White

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaMcMaster UniversityHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieScience and Technology Facilities CouncilBundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und TechnologieCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueKU LeuvenNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyImperial College LondonNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesUK Space AgencyCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsVelaGalactic planePhysicsMolecular cloudSpire (mollusc)AstrophysicsStar formationAstronomyMass distributionSolar massStarsStar (game theory)GalaxyPulsar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims. As part of the Herschel guaranteed time key programme “HOBYS”, we present the PACS and SPIRE photometric survey of the star-forming region Vela-C, one of the nearest sites of low-to-high-mass star formation in the Galactic plane. Our main objectives are to take a census of the cold sources and to derive their mass distribution down to a few solar masses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207