MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136407082 · doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.6.2794

Long‐term changes in legacy trace organic contaminants and mercury in Lake Ontario salmon in relation to source controls, trophodynamics, and climatic variability

2006· article· en· W2136407082 on OpenAlexaffabout
Todd D. French, Linda M. Campbell, Donald A. Jackson, John M. Casselman, W. A. Scheider, Al Hayton

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of EnvironmentUniversity of TorontoQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncorhynchusPolychlorinated biphenylEnvironmental scienceMercury (programming language)PopulationEnvironmental chemistryFisheryChinook windAnimal scienceBiologyChemistryFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We used long‐term (20+ yr) datasets to determine how the sum of 209 polychlorinated biphenyl congeners ([ΣPCB]), dodecachloropentacyclodecane ([mirex]), para‐para dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane ([ p,p '‐DDT]), and total mercury ([Tot‐Hg]) concentrations have changed in Lake Ontario chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha , 1983‐2003) and coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch , 1976‐2003). Exponential decay models best describe temporal reductions of persistent organic pollutant concentrations [POPs], including [ΣPCB], [mirex], and [ p,p '‐DDT], in chinook (r 2 = 0.68‐0.77, p &lt; 0.001) and coho (r 2 = 0.68‐0.87, p &lt; 0.001) salmon over the record. In comparison, declines in [Tot‐Hg] were slight, with linear models best describing trends (r 2 = 0.49‐0.50, p = &lt;0.001‐0.001). Rapid declines of [POPs] from the mid‐1970s through the early 1980s were attributed mostly to Canada‐United States bans on usage and sedimentation; subsequent concentration oscillations were linked to salmonine stocking and nutrient abatement programs, climatic cycles, and alewife ( Alosa pseudoharengus ) population dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and OceanographySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207