MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136408597 · doi:10.1002/cpa.20210

Projection of diffusions on submanifolds: Application to mean force computation

2007· article· en· W2136408597 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre de Recherches MathématiquesUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsSubmanifoldMathematicsErgodic theoryContext (archaeology)Stochastic differential equationProjection (relational algebra)ComputationDistribution (mathematics)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider the problem of sampling a Boltzmann‐Gibbs probability distribution when this distribution is restricted (in some suitable sense) on a submanifold Σ of ℝ n implicitly defined by N constraints q 1 ( x ) = ⃛ = q N ( x ) = 0 ( N < n ). This problem arises, for example, in systems subject to hard constraints or in the context of free energy calculations. We prove that the constrained stochastic differential equations (i.e., diffusions) proposed in [7, 13] are ergodic with respect to this restricted distribution. We also construct numerical schemes for the integration of the constrained diffusions. Finally, we show how these schemes can be used to compute the gradient of the free energy associated with the constraints. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it