MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136411676 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2006.260616

Estimating Arterial Stiffness using Transmission Line Model

2006· article· en· W2136411676 on OpenAlexaff
Mande T. Leung, Guy A. Dumont, G Sándor, James E. Potts

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission lineAscending aortaCompliance (psychology)StiffnessAortaArterial stiffnessAortic pressureCardiologyBlood pressureMathematicsAcousticsMaterials sciencePhysicsInternal medicineMedicineComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An arterial stiffness index based on the transmission line model is defined. The parameters of the transmission line model are initially estimated using measured pressure, flow and aortic root diameter. Pressure is measured at the carotid using applanation tonometry. Flow is measured using Doppler at the ascending aorta. Aortic root diameter is measured using 2-D echocardiography. The initial estimates are then refined using grey-box identification. The resulting estimate of the distributive compliance of the transmission line model is proposed to be an arterial stiffness index. Similar to the Windkessel compliance, this index describes the global stiffness. However, it is based on a more realistic 1-D model that can simulate wave propagation and wave reflection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207