MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2136461485 · doi:10.1139/e05-004

Correlation Chart of the evolution of the Trans-Hudson Orogen ManitobaSaskatchewan segment

2005· article· en· W2136461485 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kevin Ansdell, Larry M. Heaman, Nuno Machado, Richard A. Stern, D Corrigan, Irving R Annesley, Christian Böhm, H. V. Zwanzig, Al H Bailes, Ric Syme, Tim Corkery, K Ashton, R O Maxeiner, G M Yeo, G D Delaney

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Disease Control LaboratoryManitoba HydroUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of AlbertaSaskatchewan Research Council (Canada)Geological Survey of CanadaUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChartGeologyTectonicsArcheanCratonBounding overwatchGeochronologyPaleontologyGeochemistryArchaeologyStatisticsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A correlation chart showing the evolution of the Manitoba–Saskatchewan segment of the Paleoproterozoic Trans-Hudson Orogen (THO) has been constructed based on available geochronological and isotopic data. Geological, petrological, geochemical, and structural data have also been incorporated into the correlation chart to provide finer detail and to allow comparison of specific tectonic events. The chart also emphasizes that the bounding Archean cratons (Superior, Hearne, Sask) have been significantly affected by Paleoproterozoic events, and it is hoped that this chart will also facilitate comparison with other Paleoproterozoic orogens in North America and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→