MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136464099 · doi:10.1061/40792(173)39

A Numerical Study of a 2D Multi-Component Corrosion Model in a Water Distribution System

2005· article· en· W2136464099 on OpenAlexaff
Gholamreza Naser, Bryan Karney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydroxideFerrousCorrosionTurbulenceRedoxAnodeChemistryFlow (mathematics)Chemical reactionDiffusionMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryThermodynamicsMechanicsMetallurgyElectrodePhysicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of this study is to present a fully transient multi-component water quality model through a numerical simulation of flow in a pipeline considering both hydraulic and water-chemistry issues. In other words, the objective is to numerically model the concentration of chemicals in the water distribution systems during the different conditions of flow. The chemicals are released in the system due to the reactions, which take place either in bulk flow or at the pipe-wall. The later is studied herein. This preliminary study explores on the effects of important parameters such as solution pH and initial concentration of dissolved oxygen on the chemical processes such as corrosion. In this light, considering the dissolved oxygen as main oxidant, the process is chemically modeled as simple anodic-cathodic reduction-oxidation reactions (redox reactions). The iron metal oxidized, creating ferrous ion (Fe2+) at anode. On the other hand, the reduction reaction produces hydroxide ion (OH–) at chatode. Due to concentration gradient, the ions migrate within the system in order to maintain the solution electrically neutral. Then, the ferrous ion reacts with hydroxide ion producing iron hydroxide, which deposits on the pipe-wall as corroded material. In this study, one- and two-dimensional simulation models are proposed, by which the concentration of each chemical is modeled by the advection-diffusion-reaction equation, which is then coupled with continuity and momentum equations for flow. Modeling the turbulence fluctuations by the five region turbulence model, a combination of finite difference and characteristic methods are used to numerically integrate the governing equations for chemical constituents and flow. Results for a case study are compared and show good agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207