Expression and Regulation of Regulator of G-Protein Signaling Protein-2 (RGS2) in Equine and Bovine Follicles prior to Ovulation: Molecular Characterization of RGS2 Transactivation in Bovine Granulosa Cells1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The luteinizing hormone preovulatory surge stimulates several signal pathways essential for ovulation, and the regulator of G-protein signaling protein-2 (RGS2) is thought to be involved in this process. The objectives of this study were to characterize the regulation of RGS2 transcripts in equine and bovine follicles prior to ovulation and to determine its transcriptional control in bovine granulosa cells. To assess the regulation of equine RGS2 prior to ovulation, RT-PCR was performed using total RNA extracted from equine follicles collected at various times after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection. Results showed that RGS2 mRNA levels were very low at 0 h but markedly increased 12-39 h post-hCG (P < 0.05). In the bovine species, results revealed that RGS2 mRNA levels were low in small and dominant follicles and in ovulatory follicles obtained at 0 h, but markedly increased in ovulatory follicles 6-24 h post-hCG (P < 0.05). To study the molecular control of RGS2 expression, primary cultures of bovine granulosa cells were used. Stimulation with forskolin induced an up-regulation of RGS2 mRNA in vitro. Studies using 5'-deletion mutants identified a minimal region containing full-length basal and forskolin-inducible RGS2 promoter activities. Site-directed mutagenesis indicated that these activities were dependent on CRE and ETS1 cis-elements. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays confirmed the involvement of these elements and revealed their interactions with CREB1 and ETS1 proteins. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays confirmed endogenous interactions of these proteins with the RGS2 promoter in granulosa cells. Forskolin-inducible RGS2 promoter activity and mRNA expression were markedly decreased by PKA and ERK1/2 inhibitors, and treatment with an antagonist of PGR (RU486) and inhibitors of PTGS2 (NS398) and EGFR (PD153035) blocked the forskolin-dependent RGS2 transcript expression, suggesting the importance of RGS2 in ovulation. Collectively, this study reports for the first time the gonadotropin-dependent up-regulation of RGS2 in equine and bovine preovulatory follicles and presents some of the regulatory controls involved in RGS2 gene expression in granulosa cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".