Numerical and experiment analysis of nanosecond pulsed laser drilling with dual frequency
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nanosecond pulsed laser drilling is one of the most common material removal processes. Dual focus laser micro drilling is high aspect ratio micro drilling techniques. Tan et al. (2003) proposed the concept of dual focus with dual frequency femtosecond laser micro drilling on PMMA. An investigation of dual frequency micro drilling with nanosecond pulsed laser on 500 μm silicon wafer has been reported in this paper with mathematical modelling supported with experimental results. Numerical modelling has been done to study the effect of dual frequency drilling with respect to intensity distribution and resultant effect on the focused spot size. Experiments were done with single and dual wavelengths with 532 nm and 1,064 nm at different pulse energies and the results were found in reasonable match with theoretical values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it