MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136520695 · doi:10.1109/iscas.1998.705280

Statistical design of integrated circuits using maximum likelihood estimation of the covariance matrix

2002· article· en· W2136520695 on OpenAlexaff
Abbas Seifi, J. Vlach, K. Ponnambalam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicOptimal Experimental Design Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEllipsoidCovariance matrixMathematicsCovarianceEllipsoid methodMathematical optimizationPolyhedronEstimation of covariance matricesAlgorithmSemidefinite programmingMatrix (chemical analysis)Computer scienceStatisticsConvex optimizationGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new formulation is proposed for statistical design of integrated circuits with correlated input parameters. The method uses a polyhedral approximation of the feasible region and finds the maximum volume ellipsoid contained in that polyhedron. The orientation of the ellipsoid is fixed by a maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) of the correlation matrix. The ellipsoid center is a nominal design with the maximum yield. The covariance estimation is formulated as a semidefinite program which uses the sampling observations as input data. The design centering problem is presented as a second-order cone programming and solved by a special interior-point optimization algorithm. The optimal design of a switched-capacitor filter is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Experimental Design MethodsFrench-language works237,207