Shelf‐life extension of peaches through sodium alginate and methyl cellulose edible coatings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary The objective of this study was to determine the effect of sodium alginate and methyl cellulose coatings on the respiration rate, firmness, acidity, pH, total soluble solids and desiccation rate of peaches. Coated and uncoated control fruits were stored at 15 °C and 40% RH. Respiration rate, moisture loss, and changes in firmness, total titrable acidity, pH and total soluble solids of coated and control samples were determined at 3‐day intervals. The respiration rate, moisture loss and changes in quality parameters were much lower in coated peaches as compared with the control. While the maximum acceptable shelf‐life at 15 °C for control samples was 15 days, the coated samples maintained their acceptability up to 21 and 24 days, respectively, with sodium alginate and methyl cellulose coating. The reduced respiration and transpiration rates as a result of coatings were considered responsible for maintaining the quality and increasing the shelf‐life of peaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it