Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Le récent sommet des Amériques de Québec laisse présager la constitution d’une vaste zone de libre échange panaméricaine à l’horizon de 2005. Pour autant les pays d’Amérique latine et des Caraïbes sont, d’une part, très divers, et, d’autre part, traversés par des tensions internes que la pauvreté, les inégalités sociales ou ethniques, les questions liées aux identités culturelles ou religieuses entretiennent. Dans un espace conquis par les procédures démocratiques et dans le contexte d’un modèle libéral de développement économique, les pays d’Amérique latine s’engagent dans des processus d’intégration multiples et parfois concurrents. L’ALENA d’un côté et le Mercosur de l’autre dessinent une alternative pour l’avenir d’un sous-continent, qui sera aussi en première ligne pour le traitement des grandes questions « globales » : développement durable, identités culturelles...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".