MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2136580161

Oviduct-specific glycoprotein (OVGP1), a new serum biomarker for the detection of ovarian cancer

2008· article· en· W2136580161 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Maines‐Bandiera, Michelle Woo, Laurie L. Molday, Martin Köebel, Marilyn J. Borugian, Peter C. K. Leung, C. Blake Gilks, Robert S. Molday, Nelly Auersperg

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerous fluidImmunohistochemistryOviductBiologyCystadenocarcinomaOvarian cancerGlycoproteinClear cellPolyclonal antibodiesAntibodyMonoclonal antibodyPathologySerous carcinomaMonoclonalCancerOvaryEndometriumCancer researchMedicineImmunologyMolecular biologyEndocrinology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4451 Ovarian carcinomas are the most lethal tumors of the female genital tract because most are detected late in the disease course. Our previous immunohistochemical study, using a polyclonal antibody, showed that oviduct-specific glycoprotein (OVGP1), normally a secreted and glycosylated protein of the oviduct, is aberrantly expressed and secreted in low grade ovarian epithelial neoplasias, suggesting that it may be detectable in the serum of women with such tumors. We generated a monoclonal antibody, clone OGP 7E10, to recombinant OVGP1, which recognizes the C-terminal region of the protein. It recognizes OVGP1 in conditioned medium at a molecular weight of 110-130 kDa and binds specifically to secretory epithelial cells of the mid- to late-proliferative phase oviduct. Immunohistochemical analysis of an ovarian tumor tissue array using OGP 7E10 demonstrated OVGP1 in 6/10 (60%) low grade serous carcinomas (LGSC), 168/185 (91%) high grade serous carcinomas (HGSC), 96/108 (89%) endometrioid carcinomas, 20/23 (87%) mucinous carcinomas and 102/116 (88%) clear cell carcinomas. Analysis with a Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank statistics showed that positive OVGP1 staining in HGSCs was associated with a more favorable outcome (p

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment→French-language works237,207→