MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136586685 · doi:10.1021/ic401171v

Quaternary Germanides RE<sub>4</sub>Mn<sub>2</sub>InGe<sub>4</sub> (RE = La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Tm, Lu)

2013· article· en· W2136586685 on OpenAlexafffund
Anton O. Oliynyk, Stanislav S. Stoyko, Arthur Mar

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryQuaternaryCrystallographyManganeseGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quaternary germanides RE4Mn2InGe4 (RE = La-Nd, Sm, Gd-Tm, Lu) have been prepared by arc-melting reactions of the elements and annealing at 800 °C and represent the second example of the RE4M2InGe4 series previously known only for M = Ni. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies conducted on the earlier RE members of RE4Mn2InGe4 confirmed that they adopt the monoclinic Ho4Ni2InGe4-type structure [space group C2/m, a = 16.646(2)-15.9808(9) Å, b = 4.4190(6)-4.2363(2) Å, c = 7.4834(10)-7.1590(4) Å, β = 106.893(2)-106.304(1)° in the progression of RE from La to Gd]. The covalent framework contains Mn-centered tetrahedra and Ge2 dimers that build up [Mn2Ge4] layers, which are held weakly together by four-coordinate In atoms and outline tunnels filled by the RE atoms. This bonding picture is supported by band-structure calculations. An alternative description based on Ge-centered trigonal prisms reveals that RE4Mn2InGe4 is closely related to RE2InGe2. The electrical resistivity behavior of Pr4Mn2InGe4 is similar to that of Pr2InGe2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207