MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136590974 · doi:10.1186/1756-8935-6-s1-p34

Modulation of DNA methylation and phenotypic switching in Smooth Muscle Cells by the extracellular matrix microenvironment

2013· article· en· W2136590974 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaxin Jiang, Karen Aitken, Tyler Kirwan, Nicole D Zhang, Shuye Pu, Darius Bägli

Bibliographic record

VenueEpigenetics & Chromatin · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtracellular matrixEpigeneticsPhenotypeCell biologyBiologyDNA methylationMatrix metalloproteinasePopulationCancer researchPathologyGeneticsMedicineGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Partial bladder outlet obstruction due to neurogenic bladder or mechanical obstruction is common amongst the population and can cause bladder injury and dysfunction. Bladder Smooth Muscle Cells (BSMCs) undergo phenotypic changes such as hyper-proliferation, de-differentiation and altered expression of integrins and ECM proteins.[1] Extracellular matrix changes are often crucial inciting events for fibroproliferative disease.[2] Epigenetic change, specifically DNA methylation, may be important factors underlying the persistent fibroproliferative phenotype. Previously, damaged matrix (heat-denatured collagen, DNC) induced hyper-proliferation of bladder smooth muscle cells (BSMC) and the phenotype was not reverted upon a return to normal matrix. [3] We examined the dependency of matrix-induced fibroproliferation and SMC phenotype on DNA methyltransferase activity. The cooperativity of matrix with other inciting stimuli (growth factors, hypoxia and strain) associated with bladder obstruction was also examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpigenetics & ChromatinSame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207