MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136680570 · doi:10.1109/pesc.2006.1712151

Monitoring and diagnosis of faults in interior permanent magnet motors using discrete wavelet transform

2006· article· en· W2136680570 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. S. K. Khan, T.S. Radwan, Md. Abdur Rahman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete wavelet transformMagnetWavelet transformWaveletComputer scienceControl engineeringAutomotive engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel application of the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) based algorithm for detecting and diagnosing various disturbances caused by electrical faults in the three-phase interior permanent magnet (IPM) motor. The DWT coefficients of fault currents of different levels of resolution using a selected mother wavelet are transformed to the root mean square (RMS) values through the determination of signal energies of different frequency bands of the DWT. The RMS values are then used in a rule-based classifier (RBC) in order to differentiate between different faulted and normal conditions. The criterion for the fault detection is the comparison of the DWT coefficients of the fifth level details (d <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</sup> ) of fault currents using a selected mother wavelet with a threshold determined experimentally during the healthy condition of the motor. The complete protection technique incorporating the proposed DWT based diagnosis algorithm is implemented in real-time using the ds1102 digital signal processor board for a laboratory 1-hp IPM motor. It is found that the proposed DWT based protection algorithm is very fast, and has responded at the instant or within one cycle of the fault occurrence in all cases of investigated faults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207