MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136688804 · doi:10.1016/s0360-3199(00)00038-0

Quarter century of hydrogen movement 1974–2000

2000· article· en· W2136688804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Т. Н. Везироглу

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)CommercializationMovement (music)Hydrogen fuelHydrogenHistoryBusinessArtPhysicsMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A quarter of a century has passed since the beginning of the Hydrogen Energy Movement. Over the past 25 years, there have been accomplishments on every front — from the acceptance of the concept as an answer to energy and environment related global problems — to research, development and commercialization. The Hydrogen Energy System has now taken firm roots. Activities towards the implementation are accelerating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Hydrogen EnergySame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207