Detection of regime shifts in multi‐species communities: the Bay of Quinte phytoplankton example
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary 1. Human activities have led to ecological regime shifts, first revealed at the community level in ecosystems. A regime shift in a biological community is a sudden change in the relative contributions of several taxa, resulting in a post‐shift state that remains stable over the long term with a structure that is outside the boundaries of the ‘normal’ pre‐shift variability. Most methods for regime shift detection are based on univariate statistics (e.g. commercial fish catch data, sea surface temperature anomalies). Multivariate methods suitable for identifying change in multi‐species communities can be used to identify regime shifts in communities. 2. In this paper, I use a 37‐year record (1972–2008) of phytoplankton in the Bay of Quinte (northeastern Lake Ontario) to demonstrate the use of several largely independent data analysis methods that are shown here to concur in their output. Among the most powerful procedures is an approach that models the anomalies around long‐term Grand Mean and reference‐point community structures that were compared to annual structures using Bray–Curtis community similarity coefficients. CUSUM plots of model residuals, segmented regression analysis and other tests are all useful to identify the location of break‐points in records of anomalies. Follow‐up significance testing was performed separately with permutation tests. Improved sensitivity of these techniques when applied to highly seasonal data was demonstrated after extraction of seasonal components as periodic functions. 3. Statistically significant shifts in the Bay of Quinte phytoplankton were detected in the year following an approximate 50% reduction in point‐source phosphorus loading in early 1978 and again immediately after the establishment of invasive dreissenid mussels in the mid‐1990s. Associated with this second intervention was an increased representation by species of the potentially toxic Cyanoprokaryote Microcystis , and dramatic declines in some diatom species, with significant implications for human use and food web function. 4. This paper provides a ‘tool box’ of methods (most freely available on the WWW) for those needing to distinguish between true shifts and normal inter‐annual variability in biological communities. Ability to measure statistically significant change in communities can lead to enhanced understanding of cause–effect relations and to enhanced capabilities for prediction of change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".