From Ecological Thinking and Ecological Culture to Ecological Compensation and Ecological Democracy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ecology has become a new thinking approach to constantly influence social development. Ecological civilization has been raised to the top political philosophy. Ecological democracy should be a system to ensure to implement ecological civilization. The essence of compensation of china’s ecosystem service is to practicing ecological democracy. This paper analyzes the corelation of ecological thinking, ecological civilization and ecological democracy. Key words: ecological thinking; ecological civilization;ecological democracy Resume: La ecologie a deja transforme en une facon de reflechir, qui penetre dans tout domaine social. Et elle influencera continuellement le developpement social. La culture ecologique est devenue le concept supreme du parti communiste de Chine(PCC). Et il faut la democratie ecologique comme un systeme pour proteger la culture ecologique afin de sa realisation. La pratique de la compensation ecologique moyenne demande a la realisation de la democratie ecologique. Cette memoire commence par le concept ecologique en mise en correlation de l’analyse de la relation parmi la pensee ecologie, la culture ecologique et la democratie ecologique. Mots-Cles: pensee ecologique; culture ecologique; democratie ecologique
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".