MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136812754 · doi:10.1300/j155v06n03_06

The Role of Lay Theories of the Etiologies of Homosexuality in Attitudes Towards Lesbians and Gay Men

2002· article· en· W2136812754 on OpenAlex
Erin C. Hewitt, Leslea D. Moore

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lesbian Studies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomosexualityPsychologyMale HomosexualityLesbianSocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychoanalysisMen who have sex with menMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Previous research has demonstrated that those who believe that homosexuality is genetically or biologically caused have less negative attitudes towards gays and lesbians than those who believe it is acquired, learned, or chosen. This study, utilizing an undergraduate and graduate Psychology student sample, found significant relationships between attitudes towards lesbians and gay men and beliefs about causes and "treatments" for homosexuality. Level of personal contact with lesbians and gay men and demographic factors also influenced attitudes toward and beliefs about homosexuality. These results suggest that educational attempts to change attitudes towards lesbians and gay men should consider the role played by beliefs about the etiologies of homosexuality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it