MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136826435 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2009.5418303

The RADARSAT Constellation Mission: Meeting the government of Canada'S needs and requirements

2009· article· en· W2136826435 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstellationPlan (archaeology)Government (linguistics)Computer scienceSatellite constellationEarth observationSystems engineeringSatelliteRemote sensingEngineering managementProcess managementEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we describe the high level RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM) concept and how it is being designed to meet Government of Canada user requirements. The constellation concept is designed primarily as a wide area monitoring system, offering medium resolution information on a daily basis, as well as high resolution imaging functionality. We briefly discuss the unique capabilities of the constellation particularly related to coverage and revisit as it pertains to meeting the needs of each of the three Core Use Area applications. Finally, we outline the approach and activities being undertaken in the development of a Data Utilization Plan to ensure that the Canadian user departments and agencies will be ready to use data from the RCM on Day 1 of the launch of the first satellite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207