MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136863244 · doi:10.1057/jors.2009.86

An ant colony optimization metaheuristic for single-path multicommodity network flow problems

2009· article· en· W2136863244 on OpenAlexaff
X-Y Li, Y.P. Aneja, Fazle Baki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Operational Research Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetaheuristicAnt colony optimization algorithmsMathematical optimizationMulti-commodity flow problemComputer sciencePath (computing)Flow networkAnt colonyNode (physics)Minimum-cost flow problemParallel metaheuristicOptimization problemFlow (mathematics)MathematicsComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the single-path multicommodity network flow problem (SMNF), in which the flow of each commodity can only use one path linking its origin and destination in the network. We study two versions of this problem based on two different objectives. The first version is to minimize network congestion, an issue of concern in traffic grooming over wavelength division multiplexing (WDM), and in which there generally exists a commodity flow between every pair of nodes. The second problem is a constrained version of the general linear multicommodity flow problem, in which, for each commodity, a single path is allowed to send the required flow, and the objective is to determine a flow pattern that obeys the arc capacities and minimizes the total shipping cost. Based on the node-arc and the arc-chain representations, we first present two formulations. Owing to computational impracticality of exact algorithms for practical networks, we propose an ant colony optimization-(ACO) based metaheuristic to deal with SMNF. Considering different problem properties, we devise two versions of ACO metaheuristics to solve these two problems, respectively. The proposed algorithms’ efficiencies are experimentally investigated on some generated instances of SMNF. The test results demonstrate that the proposed ACO metaheuristics are computationally efficient and robust approaches for solving SMNF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Operational Research SocietySame topicVehicle Routing Optimization MethodsFrench-language works237,207