MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136881822 · doi:10.7202/1011812ar

Adam Smith as Rhetorician

2012· article· fr· W2136881822 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ian Simpson Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueMan and Nature · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArgumentation theoryHumanitiesPhilosophyAdam smithEpistemologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude donne un aperçu détaillé de la formation rhétorique d’Adam Smith ainsi que de ses activités en tant que professeur de rhétorique en Écosse. Pendant qu’il occupait la Chaire de Logique à l’Université de Glasgow, il a effectué des réformes de curriculum d’une grande importance. Des exemples tirés de ses chefs-d’oeuvre The Theory of Moral Sentiments and The Wealth of Nations font apparaître les traces de sa formation rhétorique dans la structure et dans l’argumentation des deux textes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMan and NatureSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207