MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136881822 · doi:10.7202/1011812ar

Adam Smith as Rhetorician

2012· article· fr· W2136881822 on OpenAlex
Ian Simpson Ross

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueMan and Nature · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArgumentation theoryHumanitiesPhilosophyAdam smithEpistemologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude donne un aperçu détaillé de la formation rhétorique d’Adam Smith ainsi que de ses activités en tant que professeur de rhétorique en Écosse. Pendant qu’il occupait la Chaire de Logique à l’Université de Glasgow, il a effectué des réformes de curriculum d’une grande importance. Des exemples tirés de ses chefs-d’oeuvre The Theory of Moral Sentiments and The Wealth of Nations font apparaître les traces de sa formation rhétorique dans la structure et dans l’argumentation des deux textes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it