MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136882895 · doi:10.1002/fld.2619

Extended homotopy perturbation method and the axisymmetric flow past a porous stretching sheet

2011· article· en· W2136882895 on OpenAlex
Qasem M. Al‐Mdallal, Muhammed I. Syam, P. D. Ariel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western UniversityWestern University
FundersUnited Arab Emirates University
KeywordsHomotopy perturbation methodRotational symmetryHomotopy analysis methodMechanicsPerturbation (astronomy)HomotopyPorosityMathematicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisGeometryMaterials sciencePhysicsComposite materialPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The extended homotopy perturbation method, which is an extension of the celebrated homotopy perturbation method (HPM), is applied to obtain a solution to the problem of the steady, laminar, axisymmetric flow of a viscous, incompressible fluid past a porous stretching sheet. The solution so obtained is totally analytical and is expressible in terms of the cross‐flow velocity of the fluid past the stretching sheet. Its hallmark is that it does not depend upon computation of any auxiliary parameter for enlarging the convergence region of the solution. Rather, it calculates the solution automatically adjusting the scaling factor of the independent similarity variable normal to the sheet. The results obtained by the extended HPM are in excellent agreement with the exact numerical solution. Also, an asymptotic solution valid for large suction parameter is developed, which matches well with the exact solution even for moderate values of the suction parameter. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it