MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136894491 · doi:10.1039/c0cp02062a

A DFT+U study of defect association and oxygen migration in samarium-doped ceria

2011· article· en· W2136894491 on OpenAlexaff
Arif Mawardi Ismail, James Hooper, Javier B. Giorgi, Tom K. Woo

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSamariumVacancy defectDopantDopingMaterials scienceDiffusionDensity functional theoryOxygenChemical physicsIonic bondingIonCrystallographyComputational chemistryChemistryThermodynamicsInorganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A specialized genetic algorithm (GA) is used to search the structural space of samarium-doped ceria (SDC) for the most energetically stable configurations which will predominate in low temperature fuel cells. A systematic investigation of all configurations of 3.2% SDC and a GA investigation of 6.6% SDC are presented for the first time at the DFT+U level of theory. It was found that Sm atoms prefer to occupy the nearest neighbor (NN) position relative to the oxygen vacancy at 3.2%, while at 6.6%, a balance exists between various Sm-vacancy interactions and the vacancies prefer to be separated by ∼6 Å. Also, the migration barriers for oxygen diffusion are calculated amongst the best structures in 3.2% and 6.6% SDC and are found to be comparable to the barriers in Gd-doped ceria at the DFT+U level of theory. While the migration calculations provide insight on the oxygen diffusion mechanism in this material, the favored configurations from our GA enable future research on concentrated SDC and contribute to the atomistic understanding of the influence of dopant-vacancy and vacancy-vacancy interactions on ionic conductivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207