Influence parentale sur le rendement scolaire : comparaison entre des élèves nés au Canada et des élèves nés à l’extérieur du pays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des études suggèrent un lien entre la participation parentale aux devoirs, le rendement scolaire des élèves et l’appartenance ethnique. Notre hypothèse était que l’influence parentale sur des enfants qui ne sont pas nés au Canada serait plus importante, en sciences, que chez les élèves nés au pays. Nos données provenaient du Programme d’indicateurs du rendement scolaire et contenaient les réponses à des questionnaires soumis à 24 502 élèves. Nos analyses nous indiquent des résultats statistiquement significatifs suggérant l’existence de liens entre la réussite en sciences et l’implication des parents dans les devoirs, et entre la réussite des élèves et le jugement de l’importance de la réussite en sciences par les parents. Ces résultats seraient cependant semblables peu importe l’appartenance ethnique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".