Evidence that SLC26 anion transporters mediate branchial chloride uptake in adult zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experiments were performed to test the hypothesis that three members of the SLC26 anion transporter gene family (SLC26a3, A4, and A6; hereafter termed za3, za4, and za6) mediate branchial Cl(-)/HCO(3)(-) exchange in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). Real-time RT-PCR demonstrated that the gill expressed relatively high levels of za6 mRNA; za3 and za4 mRNA, while present, were less abundant. Also, za4 and za6 were expressed at relatively high levels in the kidney. The results of in situ hybridization or immunocytochemistry (za3 only) experiments performed on gill sections revealed that the SLC26 transporters were predominantly expressed on the filament epithelium (especially within the interlamellar regions) and to a lesser extent on the lamellar epithelium at the base of lamellae. This distribution pattern suggests that the SLC26 anion transporters are localized to mitochondrion-rich cells (ionocytes). Transferring fish to water containing low [Cl(-)] (0.02 mmol/l) resulted in significant increases in branchial SLC26 mRNA expression after 5-10 days of exposure relative to fish raised in normal water [Cl(-)] (0.4 mmol/l); transferring fish to Cl(-)-enriched water (2.0 mmol/l) was without effect on mRNA levels. Transferring fish to water containing elevated levels of NaHCO(3) (10-12.5 mmol/l) caused marked increases in branchial SLC26 mRNA expression between 3 and 10 days of transfer that was associated with a significant 40% increase in Cl(-) uptake (as measured upon return to normal water after 7 days). A decrease in whole body net acid excretion (equivalent to an increase in net base excretion) in fish previously maintained in high [NaHCO(3)] water, concurrent with increases in Cl(-) uptake and SLC26 mRNA levels, suggests a role for these anion transporters in Cl(-) uptake and acid-base regulation owing to their Cl(-)/HCO(3)(-) exchange activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".