MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136995402 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2008.401

Solar Powered WLAN Mesh Network Provisioning for Temporary Deployments

2008· article· en· W2136995402 on OpenAlexaff
Ghada Badawy, Amir A. Sayegh, T.D. Todd

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProvisioningComputer scienceComputer networkWireless mesh networkNode (physics)Resource (disambiguation)Mesh networkingRouting (electronic design automation)Distributed computingBattery (electricity)WirelessWireless networkPower (physics)EngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WLAN mesh networks are often installed to provide wireless coverage for temporary events. In many of these cases, the WLAN mesh nodes can be operated using an energy sustainable source such as solar power. Node resource assignment consists of provisioning each node with a solar panel and battery combination that is sufficient to prevent node outage for the duration of the deployment. In this paper we consider this resource assignment problem with the objective of minimizing the total battery cost for a given energy source assignment. A methodology and algorithms for determining this resource assignment are first given. We then study the problem in the presence of shortest path and energy aware routing. To evaluate the quality of the resource assignments, we develop a linear programming formulation which gives lower bounds on the network resource assignment. Competitive ratios for different routing algorithms are then used, which demonstrates their effectiveness. We also include the case where some of the deployed nodes are designated in advance as having a continuous power source. Our results show the resource savings which are possible using the design algorithms and the potential resource assignment benefits of energy aware routing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207