MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137020491 · doi:10.7202/017234ar

L’opinion publique et les politiques criminelles

2005· article· en· W2137020491 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yves Brillon

Bibliographic record

VenueCriminologie · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsInternational Centre for Comparative Criminology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic opinionPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)PopulationSentenceLawCriminologyOpinion pollSociologyPoliticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Public opinion plays a role in crime policies to the extent that judges take it into consideration in their sentences and the government authorities rely on its support, for example, when changing certain laws (criminalizing or decriminalizing behaviour that is or is no longer disapproved of by the community). However, public opinion is not always based on fact. For example, the public holds that the majority of criminals are dangerous, whereas violent crimes constitute only from 6% to 10% of all crimes. The population believes that the death sentence is an effective deterrent, whereas crimi-nological research has shown that this is not so. The «vox populi» necessitates caution. It speaks “emotionally”, and although it must be heard, it is not always advisable to obey it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.830
GPT teacher head0.595
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCriminologieSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207