The ARC1 E3 Ligase Promotes Two Different Self-Pollen Avoidance Traits in<i>Arabidopsis</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flowering plants have evolved various strategies for avoiding self-pollen to drive genetic diversity. These strategies include spatially separated sexual organs (herkogamy), timing differences between male pollen release and female pistil receptivity (dichogamy), and self-pollen rejection. Within the Brassicaceae, these outcrossing systems are the evolutionary default state, and many species display these traits, including Arabidopsis lyrata. In contrast to A. lyrata, closely related Arabidopsis thaliana has lost these self-pollen traits and thus represents an excellent system to test genes for reconstructing these evolutionary traits. We previously demonstrated that the ARC1 E3 ligase is required for self-incompatibility in two diverse Brassicaceae species, Brassica napus and A. lyrata, and is frequently deleted in self-compatible species, including A. thaliana. In this study, we examined ARC1's requirement for reconstituting self-incompatibility in A. thaliana and uncovered an important role for ARC1 in promoting a strong and stable pollen rejection response when expressed with two other A. lyrata self-incompatibility factors. Furthermore, we discovered that ARC1 promoted an approach herkogamous phenotype in A. thaliana flowers. Thus, ARC1's expression resulted in two different A. lyrata traits for self-pollen avoidance and highlights the key role that ARC1 plays in the evolution and retention of outcrossing systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it