MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137108635

The implementation of a full EMV smartcard for a point-of-sale transaction

2012· article· en· W2137108635 on OpenAlexaff
Oludele Ogundele, Pavol Zavarsky, Ron Ruhl, Dale Lindskog

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Congress on Internet Security · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUser Authentication and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University of Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart cardComputer securityPaymentDatabase transactionCard security codeComputer scienceAuthentication (law)Contactless smart cardCredit cardPayment cardInternet privacyBusinessDatabaseWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the changes in the payment card environment as they relate to EMV (named after Europay, MasterCard and Visa). This research shows that if the combined dynamic data authentication (CDA) card variant of the EMV card is deployed in a full EMV environment, given the relevant known vulnerabilities and attacks against the EMV technology, the consequences of unauthorized disclosure of the cardholder data is of significantly reduced value to a criminal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Congress on Internet SecuritySame topicUser Authentication and Security SystemsFrench-language works237,207