MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137113259 · doi:10.5539/mas.v9n3p184

Map of Archaeological Sites Tracts Adzhiel in the Eastern Crimea, According to Different Sources

2015· article· en· W2137113259 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Viktor G. Zubarev, Sergey L. Smekalov

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and environmental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
KeywordsPeninsulaHuman settlementArchaeologyExcavationGeographySettlement (finance)Soviet unionScale (ratio)Ancient historyGeologyCartographyHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publication devoted to the study, by means of geo-information system, of one of the districts of the Kerch Peninsula - Tracts Adzhiel - the territory adjacent to the gully Adzhiel and her sleeves. The important ways of migration of the Scythians and other peoples from Europe to Asia, probably, passed there in ancient times. And also there are located one of the largest on the peninsula ancient fortified settlement “Belinskoye”, as well as many other monuments. The study of the territory was carried out on the squares of the graticule military topographic maps of the General Headquarters of the Soviet Union a scale of 1: 100,000. As the information sources, were used old topographic maps Russia of the end XIX century, scale 1: 42,000 (the so-called “verstovka” - 1 “versta” - 1066,8 m in one inch), maps of the General Headquarters of the Soviet Union, scale 1: 25,000, aerial photographs of the 70-es of XX century, space images of Google Earth, the data presented in scientific publications and reports. The results lead to the conclusion that on the survey area in the XIX century there were at least 150 barrows of which are currently on satellite images clearly visible only 22 and at least 12 other types of archaeological sites - settlements, ground necropols, fortifications, most of which were not previously the subject to archaeological excavations. The detailed study of these objects is planned already on the ground in the course of future work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicMarine and environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207