MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137123786 · doi:10.25115/eea.v28i3.4741

Real Time Analysis Based on Reproducing Kernel Henderson Filters

2021· article· en· W2137123786 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies of Applied Economics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical and numerical algorithms
Canadian institutionsStatistics Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsVariable kernel density estimationKernel smootherKernel (algebra)Kernel embedding of distributionsOrthonormal basisSmoothingApplied mathematicsEstimatorReproducing kernel Hilbert spaceKernel density estimationKernel principal component analysisAlgorithmMathematical optimizationKernel methodHilbert spacePure mathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsRadial basis function kernelArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces have been introduced to provide a common approach for studying several nonparametric estimators used for smoothing functional time series data (Dagum and Bianconcini, 2006 and 2008). The reproducing kernel representation is based on the derivation of the density function (i.e. a second order kernel) embedded on the linear filter. This is the starting point for deriving higher order kernels, which are obtained from the product of the density and its orthonormal polynomials. This paper focuses on the Henderson filter, for which two density functions and corresponding hierarchies have been derived. The properties of the Henderson reproducing kernels are analyzed when the filters are adapted at the end of the sample period. The optimality criterion satisfied as well as the influence of the kernel order and bandwidth parameter are studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it