MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137129808 · doi:10.1364/josaa.28.002568

Impact of finite receiver-aperture size in a non-line-of-sight single-scatter propagation model

2011· article· en· W2137129808 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed A. El-Shimy, Steve Hranilovic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America A · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAperture (computer memory)OpticsNon-line-of-sight propagationMonte Carlo methodPhysicsScatteringComputationWavelengthLine-of-sightLine (geometry)Computational physicsComputer scienceAcousticsTelecommunicationsMathematicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a single-scatter propagation model is developed that expands the classical model by considering a finite receiver-aperture size for non-line-of-sight communication. The expanded model overcomes some of the difficulties with the classical model, most notably, inaccuracies in scenarios with short range and low elevation angle where significant scattering takes place near the receiver. The developed model does not approximate the receiver aperture as a point, but uses its dimensions for both field-of-view and solid-angle computations. To verify the model, a Monte Carlo simulation of photon transport in a turbid medium is applied. Simulation results for temporal responses and path losses are presented at a wavelength of 260 nm that lies in the solar-blind ultraviolet region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America ASame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207