MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137142550 · doi:10.1063/1.1349426

Fourier transform infrared emission spectroscopy of VCl

2001· article· en· W2137142550 on OpenAlexaff
R. S. Ram, P. F. Bernath, Sumner P. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsInfraredAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Fourier transform infrared spectroscopyVanadiumFourier transform spectroscopySpectroscopyInfrared spectroscopyExcited stateResolution (logic)Fourier transformEmission spectrumChemistryMaterials scienceMolecular electronic transitionSpectral lineNuclear magnetic resonanceAtomic physicsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high resolution spectrum of VCl has been observed in emission in the 3000–9400 cm−1 region using a Fourier transform spectrometer. The bands were excited in a high temperature carbon tube furnace from the reaction of vanadium metal vapor and a trace of BCl3 and the spectra were recorded at a resolution of 0.05 cm−1. The new bands observed in the 6000–8000 cm−1 interval have been attributed to VCl. The bands having R heads near 6176, 6589, 7004, 7358, and 7710 cm−1 have been assigned as the 0–2, 0–1, 0–0, 1–0, and 2–0 bands, respectively, of the [7.0]5Δ–X 5Δ electronic transition. A rotational analysis of the Δ15–Δ15, Δ25–Δ25, and Δ35–Δ35, subbands of the 0–1 and 0–0 vibrational bands has been obtained and molecular constants have been extracted. The remaining two of the five subbands could not be analyzed because of severe overlapping from neighboring subbands. The principal molecular constants for the X 5Δ state obtained from the present analysis are: ΔG(1/2)=415.26(113) cm−1, Be=0.165 885(250) cm−1, αe=0.000 586(84) cm−1, and re=2.213 79(170) Å. Our work represents the first observation of this near infrared electronic transition of VCl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207