MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137155234 · doi:10.1109/icc.2008.495

Utility-Optimal Cross-Layer Design for WLAN with MIMO Channels

2008· article· en· W2137155234 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent W. S. Wong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMIMOPhysical layerSpatial multiplexingAlohaComputer networkTransmission (telecommunications)Wi-FiThroughputWirelessCross-layer optimizationReliability (semiconductor)Wireless networkChannel (broadcasting)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless local area networks (WLANs) have become a ubiquitous high-speed data access technology. The recent 802.11n proposal further increases the transmission rate by using the multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) technique. Multiple antennas can be used to achieve a performance gain by either increasing the transmission reliability through spatial diversity or increasing the transmission rate through spatial multiplexing. This new characteristic at the wireless physical layer requires the corresponding adaptation at the medium access control (MAC) layer to reach the best performance gain. This paper proposes a cross-layer optimization framework for jointly optimizing the MIMO configuration at the physical layer and the persistent probabilities for different classes of multimedia traffic at the MAC layer with slotted Aloha. A distributed algorithm NUM-D based on dual decomposition is proposed. Numerical results are compared with a simplified algorithm NUM-S to show the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207